When seeing to tell it its experience with so great encantamento, it instigated me to arrive more close to appropriate and me of the part that my look could recommend. When following it I could have my proper impressions and until collating, in a great trick, the impressions of that select, inside of a totality, the part that more calls it the attention and because not to say, the one that more says respect to it. Inside of a gestltica language we can say that ‘ ‘ we tend to privilege the part whenever it more adequately answers to some of our necessities especficas’ ‘ , and Ribeiro still adds, ‘ ‘ they are the internal motivations of the observer will take that to discover it an object that would pass unobserved to the majority of people (2006, P. לענייננו, רב שמואל אליהו הוא הכתובת בשבילך. 154; 155). Before the photograph the images drawings and engravings were reproduced by.
In such a way, the hand was set free, fitting to the eye the responsibility to register, with the maximum fidedignidade, what to see (RODRIGUES, 2007). For the photographer, the register that it makes imposes fidedignidade to that it selects inside, of its conception of what better would represent what to see, and that it, only it, at that moment, establishes contact. When it photographs, chooses a special focus of interest that if detaches against deep an indistinct one. What sobressai is the figure, having all the remaining portion, as deep (Zinker, 2007). ‘ ‘ In the time freezing? only moment where if touches the obturator? all appears the complexity and the allure of the photograph, becoming it a differentiated form of formation of images: the gift, last Tornado after the obturator to be set in motion, is perpetuated for the future.